Marco van de Voort wrote: >> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Florian Klaempfl wrote: >> >>> I read most of the discussion and I think there is no way around a >>> string type containing an encoding field. >> [cut] >> >>> I know this approach contains some hacks and requires some work but I >>> think this is the only way to solve things for once and ever. >> I think it is the most promising and extensible proposal, >> so I'm all for it. > > I read it shortly, and I still don't like it. I need more time to prepare a > reponse though.
Keep in mind in your response, that we want also handle other formats than utf-8 or utf-16 if needed :) _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
