At 16:00 28/10/2008, you wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Eduardo Morras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, there are some ones. There is the PAQ family that are the
best now. Of
> course they are research compressors mostly written in C++ but they exist.
> There is a freepascal/lazarus app that implements a GUI for this and other
> algorithms, at http://peazip.sourceforge.net/ (i'm not the developer).
The do mention peazip in the following page, but they do not have
values for it in the "Comparison of efficiency" table.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_archivers
An archiver is not a compressor and viceversa. Tar is an archiver but
not compress v.gr. You can look at the compressor efficiency at this
page http://cs.fit.edu/~mmahoney/compression/text.html, there is
Peazip using deflate/zip compression but now it uses lpaq9 and paq8
(the tow of the top 5 algs) and at the
http://www.maximumcompression.com/index.html
Regards,
- Graeme -
Again HTH
L
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If debugging is the art of eliminate bugs in source code, is
programming the art of create them?
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
