On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said: > > > > P.s. Speaking about docs: I saw the current documentation is still badly > > > linked. > > > (the next/prev links) I also retried myself using the most recent tex4ht > > > updates (januari 2009), and failed again, the links are still borked, > > > though > > > i have a feeling they are slightly better. > > > > I'm happy that you think they are better :-) > > > > But as far as I'm concerned, this is a non-issue. > > The HTML version of the docs is still only a courtesy. > > I don't agree that the fact that HTML docs is secondary makes it > automatically a non-issue :-) A "lesser" issue of course, but OTOH we have > been messing with it for over ten years (I started with Latex2html 96) now, > and it is still borked. > > I'm thinking of trying to create an html fixer app. I know, that wouldn't be > the first too, but at least it would be better than this. Feel free to do so... I will not stop anyone from doing so. Although it might be better to try and fix tex4ht, more people will benefit from that :-) Michael. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal