Hi, > The JCL is not very portable, and worse, non-portable and portable parts > are not very well separated. They have half of the units depending on > units that try to read the borland debug format etc.
It is strange because there are conditional compilation IFDEFs for FPC. Why to include them if the code doesn't compile anyway? Ugly code I would say. Too many conditionals and dependencies. I could try to strip JclCompression unit so that only the essence or "real beaf" is left there. It needs lots of work and feels really stupid and useless. How do other people handle this? In some post someone claimed that JCL compiles somehow under FPC. Well, it doesn't! Juha Manninen _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
