i mean that FPC-XML tries to be too general and this leads to too
cumbersome code in various situations (FPC-XML is clearly overkill for
my needs).

2010/1/28 Michael Van Canneyt <mich...@freepascal.org>:
>
>
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior wrote:
>
>> im actually needing better RTTI as to allow easier method invocation...
>>
>> But generally i feel my way of doing XML is better than FPC defaults
>> (Too generic, tries to solve too many problems with the same code)
>
> What exactly do you mean by FPC defaults ?
>
> Michael.
> _______________________________________________
> fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pas...@lists.freepascal.org
> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
>
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to