i mean that FPC-XML tries to be too general and this leads to too cumbersome code in various situations (FPC-XML is clearly overkill for my needs).
2010/1/28 Michael Van Canneyt <mich...@freepascal.org>: > > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior wrote: > >> im actually needing better RTTI as to allow easier method invocation... >> >> But generally i feel my way of doing XML is better than FPC defaults >> (Too generic, tries to solve too many problems with the same code) > > What exactly do you mean by FPC defaults ? > > Michael. > _______________________________________________ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pas...@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal > _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal