Am 22.04.2011 12:58, schrieb Sven Barth: >> No. He can define a record helper operator. The question is simple: do >> we want generics behave like macros or more like .Net generics. Some >> hybrid approach is imo wrong. > > Before I forget it: Why do you think that a hybrid approach is wrong?
I meant a semantical hybrid approach, not technical because Users want simply rules how things work. So the rule: "only symbols available during generic definition time are available during specialization" is a simple rule. Every exception like: but operators are available as well are hard to understand for a user. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
