On 2011-04-22 20:05, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
IMO a helper is bound closer to a type than an operator.
Please explain ? To my understanding, they're on exactly the same
level ?
(from a language feature point of view).
I mean, what can be more close to a type than a := operator ?
From MY point of view operator is a (special) function, that takes
(one/two/...) parameters and returns a result.
So I would agree that helper is "closer" than an operator.
Regards
Žilvinas Ledas
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
