Am 30.07.2011 22:54, schrieb Flávio Etrusco: >>> >>> Repeating myself, if there isn't something like CodeTools (i.e. only >>> with text search) is way more difficult to search for operator >>> declarations. >> >> Why? Searching for operator+ is no more difficult than for function add ? >> > > Blanks and linebreaks... Of course if one always use the same editor, > that supports searching for linebreaks, and often use Regex in it, > maybe they'll remember whether its Regex flavor uses \b or \s or \w > for blanks :-/ Of course this is not major, just annoying, since > you'll rarely need it.
But the same applies to functions as well? nobody provents you to code like function add(...) : ...; ? Searching for add might not be feasible because the symbol could be used a lot (I know about this because I'am a heavy "jump to symbol by grep"-user :) > But maybe if FPC forced the symbol to follow the keyword immediately... ;-) _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
