On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:48 AM, leledumbo <leledumbo_c...@yahoo.co.id> wrote: >> But if I have many methods with a identifier like Value, I will have > to modify all methods and put something like lValue, Value1, etc. > > Trust me, that's MUCH better than letting the compiler compiles wrong code. > i.e. it refers to identifier we don't mean to refer. I've had a lot of this > before and the compiler really helps here to avoid hidden error. I usually > don't use prefix on identifiers but rename it to something more appropriate > (or specific) instead.
The "prefix approach pattern" is used a long time in arguments, e.g., AValue (I prefer aValue). We do not have case-sensitive so, everything should have a prefix or something to distinguish an indentifier of other (types, classes, interfaces, units, etc); I'm just following the pattern of language. ;-) Marcos Douglas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
