Ludo Brands wrote:
And IMHO this all reeks of that. (dll name in component). Sounds "easy", but it doesn't really solve anything.Making it easier for the programmer to specify the library he wants will put a halt on "this discussion returning in some way or the other every 6-9 months". What is recurring in these discussions also is the non- or badly-documented ibase60dyn.initializeibase60('whatever.so'), or equivalent, being brought up at one stage as "the" solution that should make an end to the discussion. So if a libraryfilename property would only solve the recurring discussions and miscomprehensions (assuming that is a sharedobjective) then it would already be a big step forward.
I agree. -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
