someone wrote about a better performance using "with". is that true? even with a simple pointer as in:
with ptr^ do begin prop1 := ... prop2 := ... end; which should be faster then ptr^.prop1 := ... ptr^.prop1 := ... others wrote it is just usefull to save writing time ... Em 14.09.2014 12:40, Luca Olivetti escreveu: > El 14/09/14 17:20, Marco van de Voort ha escrit: > >> In our previous episode, Martin Schreiber said: >> >>>> basically stopped using it. >>> Why does Free Pascal not invent a safe "with" similar as the "with" of MSElang? >> The primary question is of course if there is a need for a new construct at all. I don't know MSELang, but many new languages try to add new baroque constructs in a desperate attempt to draw users. I always found that doubtful. > > I replied this morning about TI pascal (ca.1979), but for some reason I > don't see it in the list. > > Anyway > > https://archive.org/stream/bitsavers_titm990100_41473222/MP351_MPP_UsersManual#page/n183/mode/2up [1] > > Bye Links: ------ [1] https://archive.org/stream/bitsavers_titm990100_41473222/MP351_MPP_UsersManual#page/n183/mode/2up
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
