On 29/08/15 13:40, Florian Klämpfl wrote: > Am 29. August 2015 12:00:26 nachm. schrieb Jonas Maebe > <jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be>: >> >> In any case: you should have to pass OPT="-dFPC_ARMHF" to get an armhf >> compiler (even if you already start with an armhf compiler). > > This should not be necessary?
I also used to think so, but I can't find where FPC_ARMHF it would be automatically defined for an armhf compiler. It only defines CPUARMHF as far as I can see. Jonas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal