On 29/08/15 13:40, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> Am 29. August 2015 12:00:26 nachm. schrieb Jonas Maebe
> <jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be>:
>>
>> In any case: you should have to pass OPT="-dFPC_ARMHF" to get an armhf
>> compiler (even if you already start with an armhf compiler).
> 
> This should not be necessary?

I also used to think so, but I can't find where FPC_ARMHF it would be
automatically defined for an armhf compiler. It only defines CPUARMHF as
far as I can see.


Jonas

_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to