Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 29/08/15 11:55, Martin Schreiber wrote:
"
make PP=/home/pi/fpc/3_0/eabihf/lib/fpc/3.0.1/ppcarm OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK=1
all
"
in a fixes_3_0 checkout works for me.
Note that Mark is building 3.0.0rc1, not fixes_3_0. Building an older
revision with a compiler built from a newer revision is never supported
(although in this very specific case, it might work since there are
barely any differences between 3.0.0rc1 and the current fixes_3_0 branch).
I'm under a bit of pressure to demonstrate that a Raspberry Pi is a
"real computer", not just a target for a cross compiler (I've done
plenty of that sort of thing in the past).
Martin, what would be really useful is knowing /exactly/ what sources
you used to build your binary at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mseide-msegui/files/fpcarm/
In any case: you should have to pass OPT="-dFPC_ARMHF" to get an armhf
compiler (even if you already start with an armhf compiler). I haven't
updated the compiler readme yet, but I've at least mentioned this in the
mean time at
http://wiki.freepascal.org/FPC_New_Features_3.0#Support_for_the_armhf_EABI
Thanks, noted and aware.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
