On 01/02/2016 10:28, Sven Barth wrote:
I have to admit though that I forgot about the potential problems due
to refactoring. I'll change the name to avoid this pitfall, though
I've yet to decide which one.
well (playing devils advocate), why not IF(a<b, 1, 2).
Only it will have to be written as &IF()
That already works today. The below compiles with fpc 3.0. (And I would
guess, few (if any) are using this)
function &if(a: boolean; c,b: integer): integer;
begin
end;
var
x: Integer;
begin
x := &if(1<2,2,3);
end.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
