On Tuesday 02 February 2016 13:22:01 Jonas Maebe wrote: > Michael Van Canneyt wrote on Tue, 02 Feb 2016: > > [evaluating all arguments to a function/intrinsic] > > > I'm just trying to to put any foaming-at-the-mouth argumentation > > using this particular argument in perspective. > > I think this is rather disingenuous after your own > foaming-at-the-mouth hyperbole (?) of reverting all changes and > temporarily shutting down the svn server if someone else did something > that you considered to be fundamentally wrong. > > > For a correct understanding: The compiler must behave predictable at all > > times, no arguing there. But I don't think that iif() having different > > semantics than all other functions, is a problem. > > Including all other functions called iif(). > > > It just needs to be > > documented properly. It is a non-issue for me. > > It is a deal breaker for me. > Agreed.
Martin _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal