On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Michael Van Canneyt <mich...@freepascal.org> wrote: > b) a ? b : c > From the people that responded in the core discussion, the majority was for > the a ? b : c syntax, or not adding at all (not all replied).
You mean like literally using "?" and ":" ? > If someone feels like submitting a patch that implements a ? b : c, it may > well be taken under advisement. I heard no-one speaking out clearly against > the actual functionality (well, maybe one) or the a ? b : c form. aha, I see, Sven's message wasn't clear about it, it sounded like core is completely against any implementation. While actually simply no-one is working on the desired solution, which are 2 very different things. > "if then" is a statement. This is a clear and unambiguous rule. The idea was "inline if" not "if" -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal