On Thu, 18 May 2017 14:23:41 +0100 Graeme Geldenhuys <mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk> wrote:
> This thread is getting a bit ridiculous - just like the Lazarus Forum > thread did. Bottom line is, the exact same code (identical, just the > language syntax that differed) produced acceptable results with GCC and > Java. It didn't with FPC. We all now know FPC doesn't do such a great > job at optimisation (I know the reasons why), and that the graphics > API's is also not to blame. This we know for years. The bottlenecks would have been interesting to show if there could be something done to improve the situation. Just stating that it's slower doesn't help. > So lets leave it at that. Seems to be better. R. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
