> On May 27, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd 
> <markmll.fpc-pas...@telemetry.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> someFunction(TPoint(X:0.0; Y:0.0));
> 
> Pascal purists would probably object to that style, since what it's 
> effectively doing is passing the parameters as an explicit list.

I mentioned this form of “default constructor" as a sorely missing feature in 
FPC a couple weeks ago. Making redundant constructors for records constantly is 
pretty silly. If I could figure out the compiler code I would add this myself 
since it’s probably one of the easier things to implement.

Regards,
        Ryan Joseph

_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to