On 03/07/17 21:00, Bo Berglund wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 12:27:45 +0000, Mark Morgan
Lloyd<markmll.fpc-pas...@telemetry.co.uk> wrote:
You were asking a few days ago about Application.ProcessMessages but >didn't
respond to my attempt to tease out your understanding of what was >happening. Have
you sorted that out to your satisfaction?
I made a Lazarus GUI program to convert a serial stream to TCP to aremote
server where it was again converted to serial.The question was raised because I
have used APM inside the main loopof the application in order for it to process
stuff like mouse clicksetc while running the main task.Then I figured that I
should make a console program with the samefunctions, but APM is part of the
Forms unit and this is not used by aconsole. So I was thinking that maybe the
data handling wouyld notwork if it was missing...
Now I decided to keep the GUI app and use it interactively when I needto run
against the remote system.
What's happening there is that an LCL-based program is single threaded,
and if you're in any sort of tight loop you need to call APM to get any
of the usual GUI stuff to work.
When I coded those two extra reads the Linux/Solaris implementation had
a comparatively tight loop, so I added the callback so that if they were
being used in the main thread the GUI would carry on working. The
Windows implementation isn't so careful with that.
If they were instead being called from a background thread you'd
obviously /not/ call APM, since in general that can only be safely
called from the main (foreground) thread. However they can still be
called usefully to put a Sleep(0) in the loop, i.e. a hint to the kernel
that it can reschedule if it wants to.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
