On 17/07/18 09:15, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 03:02:42PM +0200, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:> Santiago A. <s...@ciberpiula.net> schrieb am Mo., 16. Juli 2018, 13:41:> > > I have some suggestions of change to freepascal syntax, just to debate> >> > (All are backward compatible)> >> > - Declaring variables inside blocks, and loop variables> >> -> reduces readability -> no interest How can it reduce readability? You move variables closer to where theyare used, therefore reducing clutter in the main "var" section.Limiting variable scope is definitely a good thing, I sure hope you'renot arguing against that. That's why almost all languages encourage it.
Agreed, and that's /particularly/ the case with something like a loop control variable which should not be assumed to have a predictable value out-of-scope.
Wirth moved variables outside blocks to make Pascal incompatible with ALGOL, since after the disastrous ALGOL-68 fiasco he wanted to plough his own furrow. That doesn't necessarily make the decision a wise one.
-- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
