On 05/03/2020 08:24, Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote: > Yes, it's a temporary variable but doesn't it make sense to give an error > because the property is read only? It's basically a no-op like it is now and > defeats the purpose of read-only properties. It also creates a nasty bug > because the programmer thinks they've written to something but they actually > didn't. > > Can we consider changing this behavior?
I think there is already an open bug report for this. Jonas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
