> On Mar 5, 2020, at 2:24 PM, Ryan Joseph <generic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Can we consider changing this behavior?
from https://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/2020-March/057434.html On 05/03/2020 08:24, Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote: > Yes, it's a temporary variable but doesn't it make sense to give an error because the property is read only? It's basically a no-op like it is now and defeats the purpose of read-only properties. It also creates a nasty bug because the programmer thinks they've written to something but they actually didn't. > > I think there is already an open bug report for this. Jonas ================ I looked on the bug tracker for "properties" and didn't see this so I'll make one but I wanted to confirm first it's not intended behavior. Jonas seems to hint that it is but Sven didn't mention it. Regards, Ryan Joseph _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
