John Sgammato wrote:
I think you're right on, Lin.
You know the tools you need to produce your deliverables.
I don't tell my plumber what kind of wrench to use...
john
Sounds more like a case of "I don't tell my plumber which voltmeter to
use..."
Does Mr./Ms. Quality understand why "Help" is in the RoboHelp name? Why
on earth would you choose such a tool to create a whole list of
deliverables *none of which* is Help?? (Because when all you have is a
hammer, everything looks like nails...)
You're right to stick to your guns, Lin -- you're using the best tool
there is for the job you have to do. It would be very foolish and
counterproductive indeed to standardize on RH for your deliverables.
Good luck!
stuart
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lin Surasky
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 2:10 PM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: FM v. RoboHelp
No, it's not a typo. No, we're not being asked to use Word....
The person in charge of "quality" for our company does not seem to
understand why we don't use RoboHelp to create content for our software
manuals. After all, every office has RoboHelp (not the Adobe version),
so what's the big deal? To me, the big deal is that we deliver PDFs, not
CHMs, to our customers, and they like the layout. And it's faster to
work in FM than it is in RH. My rule is, if I have to provide a TOC,
it's a book. If I'm providing a book, I'm working in FM. If they decide
they ALSO want HTML or CHM files, I can do that too, with FrameMaker and
MIF2Go. I can't create a CHM in RH and then effortlessly have a pretty
PDF to give our other customers, or can I?
For the record, we are not currently delivering ANY online help. We
deliver User Guides, Admin Guides, Release Notes, and
whitepapers/reports. All are electronic -- no printing except for the
pages our users want to print for themselves. Am I wrong to stick so
stubbornly to my FM process?
FM Process: Source content created and maintained in FM book. For
delivery, PDFs are generated with live x-refs/links where necessary
using Acrobat. If users want or need HTML, MIF2Go is ready to -- er, go.
(No one in the US has EVER asked for a CHM, but if it should happen, use
HTML Help Workshop to compile the HTML Help from MIF2Go.)
RH Process: Source content created and maintained in RH. For delivery,
PDFs are generated and look awful because there's no clean page layout
formatting OR CHMs are delivered.
Does it even make sense to deliver CHM for browser-based software being
accessed over a network, since CHMs need to be accessed from the hard
drive (unless you get into registry edits, which is NOT an option for
us.)
(We're also not doing much file-swapping amongst writers; we all kind of
do our own thing, and there's not much room for content reuse right now,
but still they want everyone to follow the same process...)
Ideas? Feedback? I promised I would get opinions from the experts over
here, as I apparently don't qualify as one myself... So what would you
do, wise ones?
Lin
_______________________________________________
--
Stuart Rogers
Technical Communicator
Phoenix Geophysics Limited
Toronto, ON, Canada
+1 (416) 491-7340 x 325
srogers phoenix-geophysics com
"Developers explain How the Product Works.
Technical writers explain How to Work the Product."
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com
Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
