As there is an entire industry based on usability. Also the first to go when the belt needs tightening, because they are perceived as being "nice to have when the economy is good, but otherwise not particularly useful." To believe that a secondary industry is necessary to assure an acceptable level of quality in production is impoverished. Quality goods can be produced by motivated, competent workers without a QA overseer. > Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:03:01 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL > PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: radical revamping of techpubs> CC: [EMAIL > PROTECTED]; framers@lists.frameusers.com> > I can't see how quality can > possibly be subjective if there's an> entire occupation devoted to assuring > it. Perhaps TW has only worked> in environments where "quality" is merely a > buzzword.> > On 10/19/07, Flato, Gillian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > I have > seen enough bug reports in my time to know that quality is not> > subjective. > If the software generates a mile-long list of bugs reported> > by customers > and QA people, the software application is crap.> > -- > Bill Swallow> HATT > List Owner> WWP-Users List Owner> Senior Member STC, TechValley Chapter> STC > Single-Sourcing SIG Manager> http://techcommdood.blogspot.com _________________________________________________________________ Help yourself to FREE treats served up daily at the Messenger Café. Stop by today. http://www.cafemessenger.com/info/info_sweetstuff2.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_OctWLtagline_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
