If it is good enough for IBM, it is probably job safe in smaller companies:
http://www.ibm.com/redbooks/redwiki Some lists of wiki systems, proprietary as well as free: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wiki_software http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WikiEngines http://www.wikimatrix.org/ http://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonWikiEngines http://java-source.net/open-source/wiki-engines A popular integrated wiki/tracking/revision environment: http://trac.edgewall.org/ kind regards Peter Ring Chris Borokowski wrote: > I won't use WikiPedia as a source anymore because I've > been burned too many times. The writers tell you what > they want to tell you, which is often far from > comprehensive. It's a very biased, often inaccurate, > source. It's worth the extra five minutes to do the > real research. > > However, wikis as a concept shouldn't be confused with > Wikipedia. I like wikis in small settings like > companies where someone can fix or weed out the > inaccurate. As someone else here said, they're > conversational sources of information. People document > informal best practices through them, and you should > consider them like a half-drunk SME: they'll give you > an answer that's mostly complete in a shorthand of > their own. > <snip/>