Actually, I'd take the opposite viewpoint. Because users have different needs, there should be a larger multitude of plug-ins to accommodate those specializations and unique needs and ways of working.
Art Campbell art.campbell at gmail.com "... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52 Vincent and a redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson No disclaimers apply. DoD 358 On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Writer <generic668 at yahoo.ca> wrote: > *shrug* > > Different users have different needs, and FM tables don't meet mine. > > As to the OP's op, we shouldn't have to have a multitude of plug-ins for > FM. It should work the way it should work. > > Nadine > > On 12/02/2010 5:24 AM, Yves Barbion wrote: >> Tables not FM's strong point? Hmmm, I haven't heard that one before, Nadine. >> I've seen a prepress company buying FM only for its powerful table features. >> They had to produce travel catalogs of several hundreds of pages full of >> tables and pictures and they couldn't get the job done with Quark XPress or >> InDesign at the time. >> >> And yes, Rick's TableCleaner >> <http://www.frameexpert.com/plugins/tablecleaner/>is a must-have plug-in. >> >> Cheers >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > > > You are currently subscribed to Framers as art.campbell at gmail.com. > > Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com. > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to > framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com > or visit > http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/art.campbell%40gmail.com > > Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit > http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info. >