Just cite the "Friends" episode and provide a link to it? :)
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021, 4:16 PM <tamm...@spectrumwritingllc.com> wrote: > OK, I know this is off-topic but because this list is filled with seasoned > veterans of technical writing, I know I can get my answer here. I am > working > on the references for a client document, and have to sort through the > existing references that I was given and make sure it is accurate, current, > etc., and I came across a couple of instances of a reference within a > reference such as: > > > > Rodgers, T., Leahy, D., et al. (2005). "Physiologically based > pharmacokinetic modeling 1: predicting the tissue distribution of > moderate-to-strong bases." J Pharm Sci 94(6): 1259-76. > > > > Rodgers, T., Leahy, D., et al. (2007). "Rodgers T, Leahy D, Rowland M. > 2005. > Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling 1: Predicting the tissue > distribution of moderate-to-strong bases. J Pharm Sci 94:1259-1276." J > Pharm > Sci 96(11): 3151-3152. > > > > You can see that the first reference is embedded/cited in the second > reference. This was not the way that I was taught a gazillion years ago to > cite an embedded reference. Basically, if the content of the embedded > reference was standalone in a new reference, regardless of the source, then > the new reference was all that was cited, for example: > > > > Rodgers, T., Leahy, D., et al. (2007). Physiologically based > pharmacokinetic > modeling 1: Predicting the tissue distribution of moderate-to-strong bases. > J Pharm Sci 96(11): 3151-3152. > > > > I looked at these papers and the content was standalone in the second > reference and it cited the first reference for the content, but because the > content was standalone in the second reference, I should cite only the > second reference where appropriate. (God, does that even make sense. . . I > am thinking of the Friends episode, "The One Where Everybody Finds Out," > and > they don't know that we know that they know and Joey loses his mind.) > > > > I just need some advice from some seasoned writers about how to handle > this. > > > > Thanks! > > > > TVB > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > < > https://home.mcafee.com/utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-e > > mail&utm_content=emailclient?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=s > ig-email&utm_content=emailclient > <https://home.mcafee.com/utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>> > Scanned by McAfee > < > https://home.mcafee.com/utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-e > > mail&utm_content=emailclient?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=s > ig-email&utm_content=emailclient > <https://home.mcafee.com/utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>> > and confirmed virus-free. > _______________________________________________ > > This message is from the Framers mailing list > > Send messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com > Visit the list's homepage at http://www.frameusers.com > Archives located at > http://www.mail-archive.com/framers%40lists.frameusers.com/ > Subscribe and unsubscribe at > http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com > Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com > _______________________________________________ This message is from the Framers mailing list Send messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com Visit the list's homepage at http://www.frameusers.com Archives located at http://www.mail-archive.com/framers%40lists.frameusers.com/ Subscribe and unsubscribe at http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com