On 18 Dec 2008, at 11:13, Tom Lazar wrote:
in the end it comes down to how much we all care about plone (about
which there can be no doubt regarding the new team) and the
collective wisdom of the entire(!) community (which is completely
independent from the fwt composition).
+1
but perhaps we could make the 'UI impact component' a formal part of
the evaluation of a PLIP, i.e. add it as a formal part of the
structure of a PLIP (in addition to the current ones such as
Deliverables, Participants etc.)
Recently, it was proper for voting or whatever to be held in private.
Now, IMHO it's sufficient for Team members discuss/decide, publicly,
how best to make the PLIP routine work *for them* -- and for the
community.
[√] The discussion is occurring.
[√] People who are not members of the Team are permitted to address
the list.
[√] The level of publicity is currently sufficient; addressing plone-develop...@lists.sourceforge.n
et causes the discussion to appear at <http://plone.org/support/forums>.
[x] The level of publicity is not always what it should be; <http://plone.org/support/lists
> and <http://plone.org/support/forums> omit <http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
>
To address the latter, <http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2008-November/002430.html
>:
Framework Team transparency
_______________________________________________
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
