Previously Andreas Zeidler wrote: > Andreas Zeidler wrote: > >Hanno Schlichting wrote: > >>The general idea that seems to have met some consensus is to go for a > >>Plone 3.5 release up next. > > > >sounds good to me, +1. > > actually, i think it should still be plone 4.0 (with the remaining > features deferred to 5.0 or later). otherwise i think it's a good idea > in the sense of "release early, release often".
+1 In hindsight I feel it was a mistake to assign a version number to Plone trunk. It might end up being Plone 5, 6, 7 or 3000. Using Plone 4 instead of 3.5 means that we will not break our promise to never break stability in the 3.x, something I feel quite strongly about. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <wich...@wiggy.net> It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. _______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
