On 18-08-2010 08.07, Martin Aspeli wrote: >> • 10778 (Stand-alone UUID)
> I think my reason for wanting it in the core, is twofold: > > - There's a proliferation of half-solutions to this problem right > now. We need something blessed that people feel safe relying on. There > is a cost associated with each half-solution in terms of catalogue > bloat and in terms of confusion. We have repeatedly had frustration with the lack of a unified UID system that we can depend on when writing add-ons. To base something on it as a developer, you need to know you can depend on it being available always. I don't think it makes sense to postpone it "because nothing uses it yet". -- Geir Bækholt www.jarn.com/baekholt _______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
