On 26 February 2011 20:06, Alec Mitchell <ale...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Elizabeth Leddy <ele...@umich.edu> wrote: >>> Feel free to respond over email or just edit the >>> document: http://dev.plone.org/plone/wiki/PlipProcess >> >> Great work! > > Agreed! This has the potential to greatly improve our process and > provide the larger community of developers and users with a more > certainty about how and when things are happening in the shadowy world > of framework decisions and release management.
+1 - I found myself nodding a lot reading that wiki page. > I agree strongly with this. A 3 month cycle seems really ambitious. > While ambition may be a good thing here, we need to think about the > consequences of such a short cycle. This could drastically shorten > the support lifetime of any given release. Is that something we > really want to do? It could also put a huge burden on release > managers with respect to minor/bugfix releases (especially if we > decide to support more of these 3-month releases at a time). We might > be better off with the more realistic and practical goal of trying to > achieve a true 6-month cycle. +1 also - 6 months feels about right. Time tends to fly! Martin _______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
