agreed. unless fuzzy pictures work for you for some reason.
On Jan 3, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Jeff Kreines wrote: > The Cinelarger and Duplikin are total pieces of junk. Don't waste > your time. > > > > On Jan 3, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Myron Ort <z...@sonic.net> wrote: > >> http://www.ebay.com/sch/? >> _nkw=cinelarger&clk_rvr_id=304125622581&mfe=search >> >> >> On Jan 3, 2012, at 10:02 AM, mariah garnett wrote: >> >>> Hey guys >>> does anyone have any good solutions for making photographic prints >>> off 16mm film? I talked to fotokep about it and it's kinda pricey. >>> Any home-made solutions? like a loupe on the lens of a 35mm still >>> camera type of thing? trying to avoid both optical printing and >>> scanning digitally. >>> >>> -- >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FrameWorks mailing list >>> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com >>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FrameWorks mailing list >> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com >> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > _______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
