Put your 16mm in the negative carrier of a photographic enlarger and mask it as you like. Then you're ready to strike prints from it without any digital intervention! On Jan 3, 2012 1:20 PM, "Myron Ort" <z...@sonic.net> wrote:
> agreed. > unless fuzzy pictures work for you for some reason. > > > On Jan 3, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Jeff Kreines wrote: > > > The Cinelarger and Duplikin are total pieces of junk. Don't waste > > your time. > > > > > > > > On Jan 3, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Myron Ort <z...@sonic.net> wrote: > > > >> http://www.ebay.com/sch/? > >> _nkw=cinelarger&clk_rvr_id=304125622581&mfe=search > >> > >> > >> On Jan 3, 2012, at 10:02 AM, mariah garnett wrote: > >> > >>> Hey guys > >>> does anyone have any good solutions for making photographic prints > >>> off 16mm film? I talked to fotokep about it and it's kinda pricey. > >>> Any home-made solutions? like a loupe on the lens of a 35mm still > >>> camera type of thing? trying to avoid both optical printing and > >>> scanning digitally. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> FrameWorks mailing list > >>> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com > >>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> FrameWorks mailing list > >> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com > >> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > _______________________________________________ > > FrameWorks mailing list > > FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com > > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > > > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >
_______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
