In the UK film censorship (as opposed to certification) rests with local 
government - and in the 1980s, London County Council had a slightly more 
relaxed attitude than the rest of the country - Pasolini's Salo showed in a 
porn theatre. 

I'm sure Mano Destra and Fuses had problems. The London Filmmakers Coop, the 
Scala, and other repertory cinemas were able to get round things a bit by being 
'membership' cinemas. (And before them, the Arts Lab, where David Curtis 
screened Flaming Creatures. I may have this wrong, but I think it was also 
screened for Princess Margaret.)

Taxi Zum Klo was banned for a time. The Night Porter. Cronenberg's Crash. Louis 
Malle's Pretty Baby.

A Clockwork Orange was removed from distribution at the behest of Kubrick 
himself. Natural Born Killers couldn't be shown for some time because of 
certification issues. Ken Russell's The Devils was banned around the world. I'm 
possibly straying from the 'erotic' with those. Possibly...

Bruce Le Bruce's LA Zombies was banned in Melbourne I think. Jarman's 
Sebastiane in Ontario. I'm sure Fritz the Cat was banned somewhere..



 
On 28 Mar 2014, at 17:10, Francisco Torres wrote:

> Triumph of the Will was banned after WW2 in most of the civilized world, 
> maybe for good reasons. Still believe it may be banned in Germany and other 
> European countries.
> Ps- Even if we may think it makes the Nazis silly, which it does.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:52 PM, David Tetzlaff <djte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not experimental, and not erotic - unless you have a kink I'd rather not 
> discuss :-) - but the first work that comes to my mind when you say "banned 
> film" is "Titticut Follies". And there is definitely a body horror thing at 
> work there...
> 
> Continuing with the 'docs', but both more experimental and dealing with 
> erotics (if not, in itself, erotic), "Tongues Untied" which PBS refused to 
> show.
> 
> Also repressed by PBS - the amazing "Seventeen" by Joel Demott and some guy 
> who makes film scanners or something :-). Not 'erotic' but the depiction of 
> an inter-racial relationship was one of the elements that got it essentially 
> 'banned'.
> 
> Not actually 'banned', but the Fox News jeremiad against the NEA for having 
> funded a film organization that screened "Thundercrack" probably justifies 
> putting that on the list.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Reply via email to