This is the article of the day on the website for First Things journal:

http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/?p=1136

here's the same essay on my website:

http://www.frederica.com/writings/when-mother-comes-home.html

and here's the text:

***

Though I'm not very informed about the Intelligent Design debate, the idea
sounded inoffensive enough: scientists have not discovered a Designer, and
neither can they prove there's no Designer, so why not leave the question
open? But the concept of Intelligent Design was greeted with outrage;
clearly, it struck a nerve.

When I tried to picture why, I thought of a page in Dr. Seuss' "The Cat in
the Hat," one that comes near the end. "Sally and I" have been standing by
helplessly while the hatted Cat, with his Thing One and Thing Two, made
havoc of the house. The toy boat is in the cake and the cake is on the
floor, the rake is bent and mother's new dress has gone sailing through the
room on a kite string. The fish has been trying to warn us, but we have
stood by bewildered.

And then, through the window, we see her. There is a flash of red skirt and
a leg striding into view, terminating with a high-heel pump with a bow.
"Then our fish said, 'LOOK! LOOK!' And our fish shook with fear. 'Your
mother is on her way home! Do you hear? Oh, what will she do to us? What
will she say? Oh, she will not like it to find us this way!'"

This is the crisis point of the plot, you probably remember. I can recall as
a child finding it a terrifying moment. What if you had made a terrible mess
of things, and suddenly Mother came home?

I think that's how our materialist friends feel when they hear the term
"Intelligent Design." It is essential, indispensable, to believe that Mother
is *never coming home*. Otherwise the things we do might have unanticipated
meanings, as well as unforeseen consequences.

For materialists, it's essential that the material is all there is. If our
bodies are just machines, then we can use them however we like, and the
smartest course, obviously, is to accumulate as much pleasure as possible.
When the pleasure is sexual, sometimes new little bodies come into being,
despite our emphatic inhospitality. But no matter; those tiny bodies are
just more meaningless fleshy machines, and can be dismantled and discarded
handily. It happens every day. In fact, it happens three thousand times a
day.

In the last 34 years we've done a great deal of discarding; about 48 million
little American bodies have gone down garbage disposals, into incinerators,
and into landfills. If we stopped for a moment to imagine that some day
Mother might be coming home, we might have a prickle of anxiety.

And if the purpose of life is pleasure, what do we do with people who reach
an age or a state of health when they are enjoying substandard levels of
gusto? The obvious response is to terminate them, right? No one would want
to survive in a permanent coma.

No one would want to survive in a conscious state either, I guess, if they
were brain damaged. And they probably wouldn't want to live even if they
were fully alert and aware, but quadriplegic.

Paraplegic. Had a limp. I expect some would look at me, a plump, graying
grandmother, and find it terribly poignant, suitable grounds for "release."

These pink billows of compassion flow outward further and further, embracing
all the weak and old and unsightly of the world. Tender poison would free
them from their misery--or, at least, make their misery disappear. And a
world without misery is a perfect world, isn't it? Last week I saw a young
woman with Down Syndrome, and realized how rare it is to see them any more.
Prenatal testing means they can be tagged and terminated before they are
born. Thus we make progress toward a world where everyone is uniformly
healthy, hearty, and attractive. And if they know what's good for them,
they'll stay that way.

"'But your mother will come. She will find this big mess! And this mess is
so big and so deep and so tall, we can not pick it up. There is no way at
all!'"

For those banking on the theory that that this is only a material world, it
would be a very uncomfortable thing if Mother were to appear. They were just
having fun on a rainy day, assuming that the cake and rake and cup and ball
were their toys to play with. But all these bodies we were indulging or
starving or tearing apart might turn out to belong to someone else after
all. And that is a prospect the materialist cannot bear.




********
Frederica Mathewes-Green
www.frederica.com
_______________________________________________
Frederica-l mailing list
*** Please address all replies to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
You can check your subscription information here:
http://lists.ctcnet.net/mailman/listinfo/frederica-l

Reply via email to