Breen Ouellette wrote on Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:22:59PM -0600:

> This really isn't relevant to OpenBSD,

[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ head -n2 /var/run/dmesg.boot                                
 
OpenBSD 3.9-stable (GENERIC) #2: Wed Aug 30 16:53:43 CEST 2006
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ cd /usr/src/sys/dev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ cvs log > cvs.log 2>&1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ grep -ic 'from.*netbsd' cvs.log
2382
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ cvs log -d \>2001-09-01 > cvs-new.log 2>&1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ grep -ic 'from.*netbsd' cvs-new.log
1156
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ grep -c ^revision cvs-new.log
21719

I'm not quite sure _major_ disruptions to one *BSD are irrelevant
to the others.  By the way,

[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ grep -ic 'from.*freebsd' cvs-new.log
469
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ grep -ic 'from.*linux' cvs-new.log   
90
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ grep -ic 'netbsd' cvs-new.log        
2024
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ grep -ic 'freebsd' cvs-new.log
784
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ grep -ic 'linux' cvs-new.log   
193

In any case, it would hardly be good news should any other free
project fail, whatever may have happened in the past.  Even if
there is some competition among various projects, one's loss
rarely is anybody else's win, when free software is concerned.

Ok, i'm not a developer; so i shall go back to lurking now.

-- 
Ingo Schwarze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Serverbetrieb usta.de / studis.de
_______________________________________________
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to