On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :
> :On Sun, 15 Aug 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :
> :> :>2) under "kern.emu.linux"
> :> :>3) under "linux"
> :> :
> :> :I vote for 3.
> :> :
> :> :--
> :> :Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member
> :> :[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
> :> :FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!
> :>
> :> Ditto. Linux emulation is going to become increasingly important,
> :> burying deep would just make everyone's life more difficult.
> :
> :Well, it's also a module, so perhaps we should create the whole subtree
> :for modules (as was already discussed several times..)
> :
> :Andrzej Bialecki
>
> Yes, this is very true. But I think we are fooling ourselves if we
> believe linux emulation will not become 'standard' in the near future.
> Then we'll kick ourselves for giving the sysctl's convoluted names :-)
Yeah... Then, the next in line after "linux" are: ibcs2 and svr4 and
whatever comes next. Can you live with them as main sysctl categories?
Andrzej Bialecki
// <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> WebGiro AB, Sweden (http://www.webgiro.com)
// -------------------------------------------------------------------
// ------ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve. http://www.freebsd.org --------
// --- Small & Embedded FreeBSD: http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/ ----
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
