Re: RFC: buildworld breakage due to cross-tools/libc/mktemp.

[David O'Brien]

On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 06:53:25AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
> > I don't see why a plain function like mkstemp() should be written so
> > specially.  Couldn't all the hiding/changing done for threads be done
> > w/in open() itself?  Neither HP-UX 10.30 (which has kernel threads), nor
> > Solaris 7 needs such open() hackery in mkstemp().
> 
> Given where we want to go with pthreads, and the proposed architecture,
> I'm not sure why we need to have open -> _libc_open -> __open (or
> whatever it is).  Why isn't using _open internally in libc sufficient?
> open is a weak symbol for _open, and libpthread can override the open
> (weak symbol).


Is this email being ignored?

-- 
-- David    ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message