On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Mike Smith wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Mike Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Here at whistle we are trying to remember about a conversation > > > > regarding malloc that occured recently. Maybe others can help. > > > > > > > > There was some talk about the fact that malloc(..M_CANWAIT) > > > > can now return with a failure. Is that true? > > > > > > Yes; it's necessary to do this to allow some chance of avoiding > > > deadlock. > > > > Ouch! Is everything in src-sys already checking the return value of an > > M_WAITOK? > > Probably not, no. I had some patches from Andrzej who was trying to do > it just for the mbuf allocator case; there's definitely a call for > someone to take the time to clean things up.
Well, it'll be hard to determine (for me, not knowing any of the kernel well) whether it's proper for: a. return EAGAIN b. return ENOMEN c. try again, then return EAGAIN/ENOMEM? But I'm going to start fixing what I can. It would have been nice for a HEADS UP! or somesuch. > > -- > \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith > \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ m...@smith.net.au > \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msm...@freebsd.org > \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msm...@cdrom.com > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > Brian Feldman _ __ ___ ___ ___ gr...@unixhelp.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \ http://www.freebsd.org/ _ __ ___ ____ | _ \__ \ |) | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ ___ ____ _____ |___/___/___/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message