:: ::Correct me if I'm wrong, but using MAP_STACK|MAP_GUARDED ::would allocate one additional guard page for each threads ::stack. :: ::DanE. : : Correct. At the moment MAP_GUARDED is a 'generic' guarding flag : and makes no assumptions about the areas being adjoining. It doesn't : cost us anything. Hmm. The more I think about it, the more I dislike what I just said. I think I am going to change it to just guard the first N pages and not guard both the first and the last N pages. -Matt Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED available Alan Cox
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED available Matthew Dillon
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED avail... Jason Evans
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED a... Matthew Dillon
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED available Matthew Dillon
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED avail... Matthew Dillon
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED available Daniel Eischen
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED available Matthew Dillon
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED avail... Daniel Eischen
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED a... Matthew Dillon
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED avail... Matthew Dillon
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED a... Matthew Dillon