On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, jack wrote:

> On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> 
> >     I think it's a *BAD* idea to change rc.conf operation for the 3.1 
> >     distribution.  Bad Bad Bad.
> 
> I have to agree.  Let's not forget that there are over 30 man
> pages with references to /etc/rc.conf.

Lets not forget that with the latest round of changes, the
rc.conf in 3.1 will behave exactly as it has in the past.  Think
about it.  rc.conf was a "touchees" file in the past and it is a
"touchees" file now.  The only difference is the addition of a
"no touchees" reference copy in /etc/defaults that gets sourced
before rc.conf so any essential variables introduced in an
upgrade will have a safety fallaback in case you don't properly
upgrade your rc.conf.

The detour with rc.conf.site *did* change the way rc.conf was
used.  That was Bad Bad Bad and has just been fixed.

-john


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to