Kelly Yancey wrote:
>
> have to support ATA devices too. He also suggested a more universal device
> name like drv0, drv1, drv2, etc rather than deliniating between whether the
> drive is ATA or SCSI...I also think that is a good idea as I don't see any
> good reason an application should care whether the drive is ATA or SCSI, as
> long as the functionality is provided does it matter how?
The boot code might be distressed... :-)
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
d...@newsguy.com
d...@freebsd.org
"FreeBSD is Yoda, Linux is Luke Skywalker."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
