> Kelly Yancey wrote: > > > > have to support ATA devices too. He also suggested a more universal device > > name like drv0, drv1, drv2, etc rather than deliniating between whether the > > drive is ATA or SCSI...I also think that is a good idea as I don't see any > > good reason an application should care whether the drive is ATA or SCSI, as > > long as the functionality is provided does it matter how? > > The boot code might be distressed... :-)
Not as long as the ordering matched the BIOS ordering. The boot code would love it. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ m...@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msm...@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msm...@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
