On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, eagle wrote: > > Whelp... I vote to break tradition. Hack away... The installer takes > > care of alot of stuff like ports installs. Perhaps different standard > > setups could be configured as ports. Ie. 'bloated setup' would require > > all the ports which are currently included. > > > > 'Server setup' port wouldn't have any Client stuff. > > > > 'Desktop' could install a 'nicer' windomanager (kde? gnome?) for teh user, > > and be pre-setup to start xdm, etc. > > > > The installer can currently install packages, so reworking those 'system > > install options' to fit simpler naming convention than 'Kernel Hacker, X > > user, X+ source, etc.' may be appropriate. > > > > I know.. lots of talk and no action. Oh well... my thoughts :) > > > well geeze Xwindows isnt in the base source tree anymore, what more do > ya want ;)
Anymore? It's never been there to begin with. ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data chu...@picnic.mat.net | communications topic, C programming, and Unix. 213 Lakeside Drive Apt T-1 | Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run picnic (FreeBSD-current) (301) 220-2114 | and jaunt (Solaris7). ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
