Hi, On Fri, Apr 09, 1999 at 11:28:52AM -0500, Glenn Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 09, 1999 at 03:52:58PM +0200, Jeremy Lea wrote: > > I always thought the criteria for inclusion of things into the base > > system was: > > > > 1. Needed for 'make world'; > > 2. Needed to get a basic functioning server up and running; > > 3. Something usefull only within FreeBSD (like the kernel ;), or > > 4. Can't be effectively built outside of /usr/src. > > > > If {g77|f77} can be built as a port, using the system EGCS, then to > > port's it goes. Otherwise why don't we include the Top 20 ports, or > > maybe the Top 25, or... > > First off, g77 is not your typical port. The build of g77 depends on > having the source to gcc on your system. The last time I checked, > installing the source was optional. The reason the current port of g77 > is marked broken is because of this.
See (4) above. Adding it to /usr/src, with a NO_FORTRAN option, would get my vote. > Future: Now it may be true that newer versions of g77 may not build > against whatever version of egcs we have but at least we would be > guaranteed of having a functional Fortran compiler. lang/g77-devel? Depends on lang/egcs-devel? > Many people don't seem to understand that FreeBSD can be used for > workstations as well as servers and Fortran is *essential* on a > scientific/engineering workstation. I don't doubt that there are more > people using FreeBSD as a server but that doesn't mean that workstation > users should be denied an essential tool because it takes up a few > hundred kilobytes. I'm a civil engineer, specialising in data analysis... Regards, -Jeremy -- | "I could be anything I wanted to, but one things true --+-- Never gonna be as big as Jesus, never gonna hold the world in my hand | Never gonna be as big as Jesus, never gonna build a promised land | But that's, that's all right, OK with me..." -Audio Adrenaline To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message