On Monday, September 20, 2010 10:06:53 am Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 20 September 2010 21:25, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > Why not include this iff both 'device ath' and 'device pci' are included? > > That is what is normally done for bus-specific attachments. > > I've not idea right now whether there's an Atheros SoC with an > AHB-attached wireless device and a PCI bus. In fact, that won't work > at the present time because the device names would clash.
Why would the device names clash? We have _lots_ of drivers with multiple bus attachments that use the same name regardless of which bus they are on, and making a bus attachment conditional on the bus being present is what every other driver that desires this level of granularity does. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
