----- Original Message ---- > From: Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> > To: PseudoCylon <moonlightak...@yahoo.ca> > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Sent: Tue, September 21, 2010 7:04:37 AM > Subject: Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring > > On 21 September 2010 11:58, PseudoCylon <moonlightak...@yahoo.ca> wrote: > > > Just in case anyone wonders, I've added 11n support to run(4) (USB NIC). > > http://gitorious.org/run/run/trees/11n_beta2 > > > > It still has some issues, > > * doesn't work well with atheros chips > > * HT + AP + bridge = Tx may stall (seems OK with nat) > > So, use it at your own discretion. > > Want to put together a patch?
sure! > > Does it introduce issues in the non-11n case? No, only in 11n mode. What I have found so far is that Ralink's driver checks MAC address of other end and identify atheros chip by oui. Then, sets special prot mode for it. Does this ring a bell? Has node lock in ieee80211_node_timeout() cased dead lock in HT + AP + bridge? AK _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
