Hi,
yesterday I tested the images listed in the subject and have the following
remarks:
- At least the memstick image contains an empty fstab
- Does the usage of a "dangerously dedikated disklabel" give any advantage?
- The usage of an UFS-Label for root mounting should be more flexible
- The first dialog step should set the keyboard layout
- The /etc is not writable which would greatly reduce the usefulness for the ISO
image (no modified resolv.conf, sshd_config, ...)
The usage of a nanobsd based base-installation would give a sufficient
advanced Live-OS installation.
You could take a look into src/tools/tools/nanobsd/rescue where I tried to
address most of the issues above primary for rescuing GPT/ZFS installations
(with still hardcoded keyboard though).
With two nanobsd slices on one memstick you can actually produce combined
i386/and64 Live-OS memsticks...
I get both on a 2GiB memstick (Without packages).
What do you think?
Bye/2
---
Michael Reifenberger
mich...@reifenberger.com
http://www.Reifenberger.com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
