On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Lars Engels wrote:
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:04:28 +0100
From: Lars Engels <lars.eng...@0x20.net>
To: Michael Reifenberger <m...@reifenberger.com>
Cc: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhiteh...@freebsd.org>,
FreeBSD-Current <curr...@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: bsdinstall-amd64-20110313 remarks
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:25:36AM +0100, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I tested the images listed in the subject and have the following
remarks:
- At least the memstick image contains an empty fstab
- Does the usage of a "dangerously dedikated disklabel" give any advantage?
- The usage of an UFS-Label for root mounting should be more flexible
- UFS-labeling does not work
I let bsdinstall partition the disk automatically and edited the
proposed partitions to add labels, but after the first boot, neither
fstab nor /dev/label showed any labels.
I did not mean to use UFS-Labels for the bsdinstall partitioner.
I meant the use of UFS-Labels for the memstick image itself.
BTW:
The UFS labels should show up under /dev/ufs/...
The cd9660 labels should show up under /dev/cd9660/...
Bye/2
---
Michael Reifenberger
mich...@reifenberger.com
http://www.Reifenberger.com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
