> > I think that 'pentium' would result in code that isn't as optimized as > 'pentiumpro', but I've heard that 'pentium' has a lot less problems. What??? 'pentiumpro' code isn't going to be very optimized for a Pentium (if it even runs at all). > I've heard that -mpentiumpro can be pretty buggy, and it can actually > result in slower code than -mpentium for certain pentium types. Yea like the original P5 Pentiums. You should match the command line with your actual machine if you are going to use these options. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Dan Nelson
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Donn Miller
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Jeffrey J. Mountin
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Maxim Sobolev
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) David O'Brien
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Dan Nelson
- Re[2]: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELE... Maxim Sobolev
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Christian Weisgerber
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Doug Barton
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Donn Miller
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_... David O'Brien
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (REL... Christian Weisgerber
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken... Jeffrey J. Mountin
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... Doug Barton
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_... Doug Barton
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (REL... Sascha Schumann
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken... R Joseph Wright
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... Thomas Köllmann
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... Thomas Köllmann
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... Maxim Sobolev
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... David O'Brien